[ad_1]
According to Tasnim news agency, last night’s draw between Persepolis and Qatar’s Al-Gharafa made the situation of this team worse than before in the elite league standings. The Reds have not won in Asia so far, and in the meantime, there were ambiguities and issues that it seems the Spanish head coach of Persepolis must have a convincing answer in this regard.
1- Strange changes in the composition of Persepolis. In 8 games of the Premier League and 4 weeks of the Elite League, this team has not yet played two games with a fixed lineup. Maybe Garrido’s thinking is a game of rotation, but for this idea, we should pay attention to several points. First, football culture is different in different countries, and in Iran, the rotating game has a negative effect even on the subconscious of the players for various reasons. The second point is that in order to play in a rotation, you should have almost the first and second teams or suitable substitutes in each position so as not to cause the loss of games and points for the team in question. A clear example of this is Jesus, the head coach of Al-Hilal in Saudi Arabia, who rested a few of his players against Esteghlal, but still took the result for himself.
2- Garrido’s team is accused of a tactical laziness. The excessive dependence on Aronov, the Uzbek star of this team, has made the positioning in the defensive third of the opponents lower for Persepolis. However, with Aronov’s presence against Al-Gharafa, no particular difference was felt in the conditions of this team in the attack phase compared to the days of this player’s absence, and it seems that the team movement of the Reds is in trouble in general. Garrido needs to fix this movement problem and the wave of attack as soon as possible.
3- Description of different duties of players who play in non-specialist positions. For example, in the match with Al-Sad Ali Alipour, he played nearly 70 minutes in the winger position, which practically lowered the performance of this player, and in the end, the team’s ability suffered because of this. Vahid Amiri, Farshad Ahmadzadeh and Omid Alishah have not been spared from these changes and have been played many times in different positions.
4- Garrido should address the lack of focus of this team in the Asian Games. In all 4 matches, this team has scored on surprise and lack of focus. An issue that the Spanish man has also reacted to. The key minutes of the game, which Garrido wanted, are exactly out of Persepolis’ hands. If you review all 4 scored goals of this team, we will reach this point.
5- different combinations instead; The confusion of the midfielders of this team is questionable. Continuous changes and of course their unfamiliarity or the description of duties and even the radius of movement fuel this confusion. The Spanish head coach should determine whether he prefers to play with two defensive midfielders or a combination of 8th and 10th position players, which of course all depends on the general style of play of the team and opponents. However, the lack of clear conditions in the middle of the field seems boring for the players of this position. If we pay attention to the balls sent by Soroush Rafiei to the side channels, we will notice this uncertainty in this style of play.
6- How long will the attackers of this team not score? How long will the defenders and midfielders of Persepolis have to put up with the attackers not scoring? What is the reason for all these failures? Attackers who have played in Europe have practically become mere scorers in this team. Garrido has a long way to go this season and these goalless streaks will pose a big challenge for his team.
7- Despite the many changes in the composition of this team, Vahid Amiri and Milad Mohammadi are the two fixed players of this coach. If, for any reason, the discussion of rotational play is part of the team’s technical thinking, then why does this not apply to these two players? Does Garrido have different ideas?
end of message/
[ad_2]