Great breakdown — you’re spot on about Suzuki fitting the INEOS strategy. He’s got the technical profile United seems to want: young, agile, confident with the ball, and coachable. Plus, at 22, he’s already shown maturity beyond his years for both club and country.

If United sees him as a long-term project who can grow under the right coaching (maybe even challenge Onana eventually), it could be a smart move — especially with the current uncertainty around the goalkeeping department.

That said, it all depends on the club’s short-term ambitions. If they’re prioritizing immediate consistency behind Onana, maybe a more experienced backup would offer more security. But if they’re looking beyond this season, Suzuki could be a gem.

What do you think — are you backing Suzuki, or would you rather see a proven name come in?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *