Liverpool’s decision to break the bank for Alexander Isak has not only grabbed headlines but also triggered a wave of criticism from football analysts and fans alike. While many see the Swedish striker as a world-class addition to the squad, others argue that the club has lost sight of its long-standing philosophy of targeting value and potential over flashy, big-money signings.
One critic went as far as to brand Liverpool “stupid” for prioritizing Isak over a £35M striker who outscored him last season. According to this viewpoint, Liverpool may be walking the same path Manchester United did after Sir Alex Ferguson’s departure—chasing superstar names rather than building strategically with players who fit the club’s identity and long-term culture.
The argument is simple: while Isak is undoubtedly talented, the overlooked option offered better numbers, younger legs, and a much lower transfer fee.
Skeptics believe that these high-profile moves rarely end well, warning that Liverpool’s current direction could eventually backfire, leaving them with an inflated wage bill and underperforming stars.
Still, the Reds’ hierarchy maintains that Isak’s arrival is a statement of intent, designed to keep pace with Europe’s elite.
The debate rages on: did Liverpool make a masterstroke signing, or are they heading toward a dangerous cycle of short-term glamour over long-term stability?
