Liverpool’s latest approach in the transfer market has come under sharp criticism, with questions raised over whether the club’s new strategy of targeting established stars could ultimately backfire. Traditionally praised for their ability to identify undervalued talent and mold players into world-class performers, Liverpool are now being accused of shifting toward high-profile, big-money signings that critics claim do not align with the club’s culture.
One outspoken critic went as far as labeling the club’s recent decisions “stupid,” arguing that Liverpool risk falling into the same trap Manchester United did after the departure of Sir Alex Ferguson—chasing marquee names instead of focusing on squad balance, chemistry, and long-term growth. The warning was clear: if Liverpool continue on this path, they may face the same struggles United endured during their years of decline.
The signing of Alexander Isak has become a particular point of contention. While Isak is recognized as a talented striker, detractors argue that there were more efficient options available, including a proven forward who reportedly scored more goals than Isak last season and could have been signed for as little as £35 million. According to these critics, overlooking that player in favor of Isak represents poor judgment and flawed scouting.
Despite the backlash, Liverpool supporters are divided. Some agree that the club is abandoning its successful model of smart recruitment, while others believe bold, high-profile moves are necessary to keep pace with rivals such as Manchester City and Arsenal.
As the debate rages on, the pressure mounts on Liverpool’s management to prove that their new strategy will not only deliver immediate results but also safeguard the long-term stability of the team.
