Enzo Maresca’s tactical decisions have come under fire after Chelsea’s latest setback, with fans and pundits alike branding his substitutions *“baffling”* and even accusing him of being a *“coward.”*
## The Flashpoint Moment
The controversy erupted when Chelsea were reduced to 10 men following goalkeeper Robert Sánchez’s red card. Naturally, Maresca was forced to bring on a replacement between the posts — but it was his next move that left supporters furious.
Instead of maintaining attacking balance, Maresca opted to substitute winger Pedro Neto for centre-back Tosin Adarabioyo. The decision effectively robbed Chelsea of their most dangerous counter-attacking threat and signaled a retreat into a deep, five-at-the-back structure.
## Backlash From Fans and Pundits
Reactions were swift and harsh:
* *“Cowardly. Maresca bottled it.”*
* *“How do you take off your most dangerous outlet when chasing the game?”*
* *“He turned Chelsea into a training drill for United.”*
Critics argue that while defensive solidity is important after a red card, sacrificing all attacking intent condemned Chelsea to surrender rather than fight.
## What It Means for Chelsea
For Maresca, this episode represents more than just a tactical debate. Fans are already questioning whether his cautious in-game adjustments undermine Chelsea’s ability to compete with the Premier League’s elite.
With the season still in its early stages, pressure is mounting on the Italian manager to prove that his philosophy is adaptable under stress — and not overly pragmatic when boldness is required.
## A Growing Pattern?
This isn’t the first time supporters have voiced frustration with Maresca’s game management. Several times already this season, he has been accused of shutting games down rather than going for the win. If that narrative continues, patience may quickly wear thin among Chelsea fans who demand attacking football.
