Union Intervention Questioned
The Professional Footballers’ Association (PFA) has been advised to step back from its dispute with Chelsea regarding the treatment of Raheem Sterling and Axel Disasi. The players have been frozen out of Enzo Maresca’s plans, prompting the union to raise concerns about potential breaches of player welfare.
Sterling Told to Expect “No Sympathy”
Raheem Sterling, in particular, has been singled out as a player who should not expect sympathy in this situation. Critics argue that, given his high wages and declining influence on the pitch, Chelsea are justified in limiting his role and moving forward without him.
Disasi’s Situation Also Under Scrutiny
Axel Disasi remains sidelined despite the club’s ongoing defensive problems. While the PFA has attempted to question Chelsea’s stance, voices within the game have suggested that the case has little merit and that the club is within its rights to decide who features in the squad.
Calls for PFA to Step Aside
Some observers believe the PFA’s continued involvement only risks undermining Chelsea’s authority. They insist that the matter should be left to the club to manage internally, without further interference from the players’ union.
