Liverpool’s decision to pursue a creative midfielder this season has sparked major debate among fans and pundits alike. With the club eager to inject more flair and unpredictability into their attack, they had several options on the table. Two names stood out prominently during the summer — Rayan Cherki and Florian Wirtz. Both young, talented, and technically gifted, they represented the kind of creativity Liverpool have often lacked in the final third since Philippe Coutinho’s departure.
However, as the season unfolds, questions are beginning to surface over whether Liverpool made the right choice. Rayan Cherki, now flourishing in his new environment, has already found the back of the net twice in just six games. His energy, dribbling ability, and willingness to take on defenders have made him a standout performer, showing flashes of brilliance that suggest he’s ready for the top level.
In contrast, Florian Wirtz — once touted as one of Europe’s most exciting young playmakers — is struggling to make the same impact. Despite his undoubted talent and creativity, the German midfielder has yet to score in 13 appearances. His performances have been inconsistent, and his influence on games has waned, raising doubts about whether he fits into Liverpool’s high-intensity attacking system.
As fans continue to compare the two, the debate grows louder: did Liverpool pick the wrong creative midfielder? While it’s still early in the season, the contrast between Cherki’s direct effectiveness and Wirtz’s subdued displays has become hard to ignore. Time will tell if Wirtz can rediscover his spark — but for now, it seems Cherki is the one making headlines for all the right reasons.
