Liverpool’s record-breaking £130 million signing of Alexander Isak has sparked a wave of criticism, with some voices questioning the club’s transfer strategy.
A fierce debate has erupted after one observer branded the decision “stupid,” arguing that Liverpool have abandoned their tradition of targeting young, high-potential players who fit the club’s culture in favor of splashy big-name signings.
The critic went further, comparing the Reds’ current path to the mistakes made by Manchester United after Sir Alex Ferguson’s era — warning that pursuing star names over smart, long-term investments could lead to decline.
At the center of the controversy is the claim that Liverpool overlooked another striker valued at just £35 million, who actually recorded more goals than Isak last season.
According to critics, this alternative would have been the smarter choice, both financially and in terms of fitting into Liverpool’s system.
While Isak’s quality is not in doubt, the backlash shows just how divided opinion is over the transfer. For some, the record deal represents ambition and intent; for others, it’s a reckless gamble that could backfire in the future.
