The midfield trio of Merino, Rice, and Zubimendi has consistently struggled to perform at the level expected in high-stakes matches. Despite the individual talents of each player, their combination on the field has repeatedly shown signs of disorganization and lack of cohesion. Rather than controlling the tempo and dictating play, this midfield setup often appears vulnerable to quick transitions and high-pressure situations, leaving the team exposed.
Recent performances against Liverpool and Athletic Bilbao in the Champions League have highlighted these weaknesses in stark detail. On both occasions, the midfield failed to provide adequate support to the defense, allowing opponents to exploit gaps and dominate possession. The inability to maintain a stable structure in the middle of the park has contributed directly to the team conceding dangerous opportunities, ultimately impacting overall performance.
Part of the issue stems from the tactical mismatch among the three. While Rice excels as a defensive anchor, Merino and Zubimendi are more suited to roles requiring fluid movement and linking defense to attack. However, when deployed together, their individual strengths seem to clash rather than complement each other. The result is a midfield that struggles to press effectively, loses control in transitional moments, and fails to create consistent attacking momentum.
This recurring problem raises questions about the decision-making behind the midfield selection. Managers must consider not just the quality of individual players but also how well they function as a unit. Continuously relying on a combination that has proven ineffective against top European sides risks undermining the team’s competitiveness and could have long-term implications in tournaments where every point matters.
It is clear that a reassessment of the midfield structure is necessary. Experimenting with alternative pairings, adjusting tactical roles, or introducing fresh options could help restore balance and stability. Until such adjustments are made, the team may continue to struggle in controlling matches and achieving consistent results at the highest level of competition.